As the presidential election looms just four weeks away, Donald Trump and the Republicans are attempting to soften their stance on abortion—though the consequences of their policies remain harsh and unforgiving.

Let's not forget that it was under Trump's leadership that Roe v. Wade was dismantled, leading to a cascade of healthcare dilemmas for women across the nation. Last week, during a vice presidential debate, Trump boasted on social media that he would veto any national abortion ban, asserting that the issue should be left to the states. But let’s be honest: Trump appointed the very Supreme Court justices who delivered the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling that obliterated the federally protected right to abortion. His shift in narrative doesn’t change the reality that countless women are suffering because of the policies he championed.

Currently, a staggering one in three women resides in a state that imposes an abortion ban after just six weeks of pregnancy—often before they even realize they are pregnant. This momentous restriction has had dire implications, including increased maternal mortality rates. In Texas, for instance, after a near-total abortion ban was enacted in 2021, maternal deaths surged by 56% compared to a national increase of just 11%. This alarming trend exemplifies the life-threatening consequences of such restrictive policies.

Furthermore, recent developments in Georgia underscored the urgent need for advocacy. A judge there overturned a six-week abortion ban, citing it as a violation of women's liberties. This ruling comes on the heels of tragic incidents—two women lost their lives in 2022 due to complications exacerbated by the state's policies. The stories of Amber Nicole Thurman and Candi Miller highlight the real dangers involved when women are denied timely medical care due to restrictive laws.

Abortion access has emerged as a pivotal issue in this election cycle, featuring prominently in debates and public discourse. During a recent debate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz poignantly highlighted cases like that of Amanda Zurawski, emphasizing the dire stakes at play. In response, Republican Senator JD Vance attempted to downplay his party's hardline position, framing a proposed 15-week ban as a 'minimum national standard.' However, voters should be cautious—any form of a ban is still a limitation on reproductive rights.

An unexpected voice in this debate has emerged from Melania Trump, who recently expressed her support for abortion rights in a video. In her new memoir, she emphasizes that the power to make decisions about one's body should rest solely with the woman. “Why should anyone other than the woman herself have the power to determine what she does with her own body?” she provocatively asks. While it’s commendable for her to take a stand, it does little to ameliorate the damage caused by her husband's administration.

This election will see abortion rights on the ballot in ten states, demanding the attention of voters nationwide. Many are skeptical of Trump and Vance's claims to prioritize women’s rights, and their choices could determine the future of reproductive freedoms in America.

As we head to the polls, remember the 21.5 million women and girls of reproductive age living under oppressive abortion bans. We have an opportunity to restore rights that were so cruelly stripped away, and it’s imperative that we make our voices heard for a more equitable future. Let this election be a turning point toward dignity, health, and autonomy for all women.