TORONTO —

Hockey legend Wayne Gretzky has made headlines with his recent comments regarding any alleged influence he may have over Donald Trump, especially amidst the U.S. president's recent remarks suggesting Canada could become the 51st state. During a radio interview on AM-640 in Toronto, hosted by Ben Mulroney, the son of former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, Gretzky made it clear that he considers himself politically neutral.

While Trump has made references to Gretzky in various contexts, including labeling him a 'friend' and once humorously proposing that Gretzky might govern Canada if it were to join the U.S., Gretzky remained reticent on political matters. He stated, "I have no political power with the prime minister or the president," emphasizing that political decisions lie firmly in the hands of elected officials.

His comments came amidst growing scrutiny from Canadians who have questioned why the hockey icon has not publicly condemned Trump’s comments regarding Canada. Gretzky pointed out that he prefers to keep his focus on sports rather than politics, sharing memories from his NHL career, where teammates bonded over games rather than government issues. He remarked, "We watched basketball, we watched baseball…Hockey players never talked about politics."

Even with Trump suggesting that he should take on a significant role if Canada were to merge with the U.S., Gretzky remains firm in his stance. He highlighted the importance of unity and pride in both countries, stating, "I always tell my kids... to be as proud of the United States of America as I am to be a Canadian."

As a cultural icon, routinely revered not just for his legendary hockey skills, but also for his role as a public figure, Gretzky's decision to remain apolitical is a significant statement in today's charged political climate. While he may be connected to powerful figures, Gretzky emphasizes his commitment to sports over politics, reinforcing the notion that the two realms should remain distinctly separate.

In a world where many athletes are using their platforms to speak out on social and political issues, Gretzky’s approach serves as a reminder of the diverse ways public figures can influence discourse—sometimes simply by choosing not to engage.