HONG KONG (AP) — A landmark moment in Hong Kong's political landscape is set to unfold as 45 prominent pro-democracy activists face sentencing on Tuesday. This case marks the largest judicial proceeding undertaken under the controversial national security law that critics argue has severely stifled political dissent in the semi-autonomous Chinese city. The ramifications of these sentences could extend far beyond the individuals involved, impacting the future of political activism in Hong Kong.

The activists, part of a group initially charged with conspiracy to commit subversion in 2021, participated in an unofficial primary election aimed at selecting opposition candidates. This election, which drew significant public interest with 610,000 voters casting ballots, was seen as a critical means of challenging the pro-establishment candidates.

The group's actions were deemed a direct threat to the government, leading prosecutors to allege that they conspired to indiscriminately veto government budgets, thereby potentially triggering a constitutional crisis. This unprecedented use of the national security law has been met with widespread condemnation and is viewed as a significant step back for democracy in Hong Kong.

Out of the 47 original defendants, 31 activists have pleaded guilty, while 14 others received guilty verdicts after a lengthy trial in May. Just two were acquitted. Those who pleaded guilty may be looking at reduced sentences, as some have expressed remorse while others remain steadfast in their beliefs.

Profiles of Key Activists

**Benny Tai** Benny Tai, a former law professor, emerged as a key figure during the 2019 anti-government protests. The unofficial primary election he co-organized aimed to solidify a pro-democracy stance within the legislature. The judges noted that Tai's statements indicated a strategic approach to challenge the government's authority, labeling them as a "constitutional weapon of mass destruction." Despite his previous standing as a respected academic and civic educator, his transformation into an alleged insurrectionist has shocked many.

**Joshua Wong** Joshua Wong's journey began in high school, where he passionately led protests against national education in Hong Kong. By 2014, he was a leading figure in the Occupy Movement, gaining international attention for his activism. Wong co-founded the political party Demosisto, advocating for democracy and independence. His ongoing commitment to the pro-democracy cause has resulted in his characterization by Beijing as a foreign agent meddling in Hong Kong's affairs. Having pleaded guilty, Wong hopes for leniency, expressing a desire for personal reform.

**Wu Chi-wai** Former chair of the Democratic Party, Wu Chi-wai exemplifies the struggle within political circles in Hong Kong. Acknowledging his guilt, Wu's defense highlights his long-standing commitment to public service and community efforts. His recent loss of both parents while in detention adds a personal layer to his case, invoking sympathy from supporters advocating for reduced sentencing.

**Gordon Ng** Gordon Ng stood accused of being one of the primary organizers, a claim he vehemently denies. While the judges recognized that Ng was not a candidate nor the mastermind behind the primary, they noted his promotions urging voter support for candidates. His perspective centers on uniting the fractured pro-democracy movement, but the legal consequences of his actions now weigh heavily on him.

This case is not merely about individual sentences; it's about the broader implications on freedom of expression and political participation in Hong Kong. As the world watches closely, the outcomes may either embolden or deter future movements for democracy in the region. The sentencing of these activists is likely to reverberate throughout the international community, increasing scrutiny on China's approach to dissent in Hong Kong.