
Is the NBA’s 82-Game Schedule Too Much? Warriors Coach Steve Kerr Weighs In
2025-04-13
Author: Yan
Kerr Calls for Change in the NBA Schedule
As the NBA drama unfolds, Warriors head coach Steve Kerr is stirring the pot with a bold suggestion: reduce the grueling 82-game regular season to just 65 games. His argument? The physical toll on players is becoming unsustainable.
The Cost of Player Health
The reality is clear: player health should be the top priority, even over fan satisfaction. Before a game against the New Orleans Pelicans, Kerr openly apologized to fans, emphasizing, "Ultimately, the players’ health is the No. 1 factor in our team’s success." This sentiment is particularly poignant considering star player Stephen Curry's absence in a previous matchup.
Why Fewer Games Make Sense
Kerr argues that today’s game is physically more demanding than ever, marked by a fast pace and a wider court. Unlike his playing days, where teams rarely shot from deep, today's players must cover significantly more ground.
Kerr’s experience speaks volumes; he played through four seasons without missing a game. Yet, the game has transformed dramatically since then, leading him to question the current schedule.
Stats Speak Volumes
Recent data reveals that star players are missing more games than ever, with the average number of missed games more than doubling over the decades. The NBA's own study linked the lengthy schedule to increasing injuries — a clear call for action.
Change Faces Resistance
Despite Kerr’s passionate plea, the financial implications of a shortened season loom large. The league recently secured a whopping $76 billion contract over 11 years, and with expectations of a salary cap spike, stakeholders are hesitant to cut games.
Star Players Weigh In
CJ McCollum, president of the NBA Players Association, stands firm on maintaining the 82-game season, relishing the challenge it presents. But as injury rates climb, the debate intensifies.
A Future Uncertain: Will Changes Ever Happen?
Kerr remains hopeful yet realistic, recognizing that sacrificing profits for player well-being may not align with America's values. But with the NBA evolving rapidly, could this be the tipping point for re-evaluating how the league structures its season?
In a world where athletic performance and player longevity hang in the balance, the discussion over the NBA's schedule is more crucial than ever. Will the league heed Kerr’s call for change, or continue down the same financially advantageous path?