Revolutionary Study: Can Most Patients With Intermediate-Risk Breast Cancer Skip Radiation After Mastectomy?
2024-12-16
Author: Wei
Revolutionary Study: Can Most Patients With Intermediate-Risk Breast Cancer Skip Radiation After Mastectomy?
In a groundbreaking revelation presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) from December 10-13, 2024, researchers revealed that patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk breast cancer might not require chest wall irradiation (CWI) following a mastectomy. The findings from the BIG 2-04 MRC SUPREMO clinical trial suggest comparable 10-year overall survival rates between those who underwent CWI and those who did not.
Professor Ian Kunkler from the University of Edinburgh, who presented the study, highlighted the ongoing debate regarding CWI's necessity for patients with fewer positive lymph nodes or completely node-negative disease. Traditionally, CWI has been the go-to treatment protocol for patients with early-stage breast cancer showing four or more positive axillary lymph nodes.
Defining Intermediate-Risk Breast Cancer
For the study, Kunkler and his team defined "intermediate-risk" breast cancer as patients with one to three positive lymph nodes or those with no positive lymph nodes, yet exhibiting certain high-risk factors that could heighten recurrence chances. These factors include aggressive tumor characteristics like grade 3 histology or lymphovascular invasion.
Study Design and Findings
To assess the effectiveness of post-mastectomy CWI, the international trial enrolled 1,607 patients representing multiple countries, focusing on various breast tumor sizes and lymph node statuses. The study divided patients into two groups: one receiving CWI after mastectomy and the other omitting this treatment. Both groups received standard axillary node clearance and systemic treatments in accordance with clinical guidelines.
The results were striking: after a median follow-up period of 9.6 years, overall survival rates were virtually the same — 81.4% for those receiving CWI compared to 82.0% for those who did not. Notably, while CWI did reduce the risk of cancer recurrence in the chest wall by more than 50%, the actual difference in recurrence rates was less than 2%, indicating that this difference may not be clinically meaningful for patient outcomes.
Subgroup Analysis
Further analysis into patient subgroups uncovered that neither patients with node-negative (N0) nor node-positive (N1) diseases experienced any survival advantage from CWI. This suggests that the omission of post-mastectomy CWI could be a safe option even for patients with positive lymph node involvement.
"The implications of this study are profound," Kunkler stated. "We find that post-mastectomy CWI does not impact the 10-year survival rates in patients with intermediate-risk breast cancer. These insights are critical for clinicians and patients to consider when discussing treatment options, as many may not need this additional therapy."
Limitations and Future Directions
However, the study credited that it did have some limitations, including a lower-than-expected number of patients with pT3, N0 disease, and overall survival rates being higher than initially anticipated.
This pivotal research was backed by multiple leading organizations, including the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), among others. These findings could potentially reshape treatment protocols and offer significant quality-of-life improvements for patients grappling with intermediate-risk breast cancer.
Stay tuned as this study continues to garner attention, making waves in the world of breast cancer treatment!